Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
1. Collective petition about fozziesov - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Malcanis wrote: X Gallentius wrote: England was able to control half the world with worse logistics than you guys currently have That's because Britain had massive capital ship superiority, meaning that no one else could have comparabl...
- by X Gallentius - at 2015.08.16 13:29:52
|
2. Collective petition about fozziesov - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Hey let's look at the map through the filter of the old system instead of looking at it through the new system. Just because you don't claim sov over empty systems that don't matter, doesn't mean you don't control them. (Only defend space you th...
- by X Gallentius - at 2015.08.16 03:46:17
|
3. FW PVP questions - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Master Sergeant MacRobert wrote: X Gallentius wrote: Master Sergeant MacRobert wrote: He can chase you back and forth until one of you decides it is pointless to carry on "rince and repeat" and one pilot quits or he stays and completes o...
- by X Gallentius - at 2015.04.06 15:51:22
|
4. FW PVP questions - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Master Sergeant MacRobert wrote: He can chase you back and forth until one of you decides it is pointless to carry on "rince and repeat" and one pilot quits or he stays and completes one to cancel the effect of your VP (almost no affect on you...
- by X Gallentius - at 2015.04.05 19:12:15
|
5. FW PVP questions - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Conflict has been reduced quite a bit already. Implement timer rollbacks on top of the high "dps check" rats and you'll make it so hard to win a system that nobody will try - which will lead to back to the old days of nobody living in FW low sec.
- by X Gallentius - at 2015.04.03 16:55:28
|
6. FW PVP questions - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Master Sergeant MacRobert wrote: Just because you like the system does not mean it is not broken. The anti-farmer argument is valid when you consider: 1. FW complexes are designed in the game as conflict drivers 2. Eve design is supposed to...
- by X Gallentius - at 2015.03.31 15:44:23
|
7. FW PVP questions - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Bienator II wrote: X Gallentius wrote: Bienator II wrote: it all didn't fix the actual problem which is: you keep all your plexing progress when you run or.. hide. The actual problem was that afk farmers were influencing the system more...
- by X Gallentius - at 2015.03.31 15:28:27
|
8. FW PVP questions - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Plato Forko wrote: 2) unless someone from your side moves into the system right after it's been flipped, nothing will stop the target corp(s) from rebasing nearby and flipping the system back when the focus shifts to another system. Whaaa??...
- by X Gallentius - at 2015.03.30 21:14:13
|
9. FW PVP questions - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Bienator II wrote: it all didn't fix the actual problem which is: you keep all your plexing progress when you run or.. hide. The actual problem was that afk farmers were influencing the system more than they should. That problem has been solv...
- by X Gallentius - at 2015.03.30 21:08:16
|
10. FW PVP questions - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Aegon the Dragonbane wrote: Professional FW defender of my Gallente Territory. I'll use any means necessary to protect our space. For the glory of the Empire! Role play error alert! It's "FOR THE FEDERATION!"
- by X Gallentius - at 2015.03.30 16:36:51
|
11. Battleships, and their use - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Yazzinra wrote: Granted, they [Battleships] were mothballed after each war, but they say action in every fight up to and including Desert Storm. Yeah there's always that one special snowflake in fleet that wants to bring his Raven to a nano i...
- by X Gallentius - at 2015.03.21 22:35:48
|
12. Battleships, and their use - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Amanda Guido wrote: This is exactly why BS were decommissioned after WW2 Even though RL nerfed battleships as much as CCP did, I don't see many "FU RL!" posts on the forums. Be consistent fellas. If you're going to knock CCP for doing the sam...
- by X Gallentius - at 2015.03.19 15:13:01
|
13. We want your corp little things! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Orion X04 wrote: Better logo creation - Increase number of layers, add simple geometric shapes that can be sized and rotated in addition to the funky shapes we have at the moment. I WANT GREEN.
- by X Gallentius - at 2015.01.28 09:47:19
|
14. Battleships, and their use - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Battleships are like the Cape Buffalo. Poor at "Solo PvP" like the T2 HAC Lions, nor great at ambush attacks like the "alpha destroyer" crocodiles, but Cape Buffalo (like BS in Eve) are great in numbers. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LU8DDYz68...
- by X Gallentius - at 2015.01.20 18:12:36
|
15. Battleships, and their use - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Memphis Baas wrote: Forget about RL navy ships and what they historically did, it doesn't really apply to EVE. They brought an anti-support fleet with them. Otherwise they were vulnerable to small ships. ZOMG RL IS JUST LIKE EVE!!!!
- by X Gallentius - at 2015.01.20 17:02:22
|
16. We want your corp little things! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I just want two things: 1. A rationally designed Corp Interface. Right now it's a "Frankenstein" interface with multiple tabs kind of doing similar types of things. 2. Import/Export ability to Excel/text file.
- by X Gallentius - at 2015.01.19 19:11:48
|
17. CCP Greyscale no longer with CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
DaReaper wrote: "omg riot/ea/whatever is taking over ccp!" Eve Online has improved quite a bit since these guys left...
- by X Gallentius - at 2014.12.08 22:23:57
|
18. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Telistra wrote: I can see it now... ISBoxer Development Patch Notes: Added new input delay timer to for broadcasts Yeah, that'll be so much harder to detect.
- by X Gallentius - at 2014.11.26 23:54:01
|
19. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
RenoIdo wrote: However, I believe isboxer and input multiplication should be banned from highsec only Let me guess, this player (and his 100 alts named Reynaldo, Ranaldo, Renaldo, Renolda, etc...) does not ever go into high sec...
- by X Gallentius - at 2014.11.26 23:51:44
|
20. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Going out of Business PLEX sale! Contact me for details!
- by X Gallentius - at 2014.11.26 23:49:48
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |